IROS 2026

QTac: Quantitative Robotic Grasping with Tactile Sensing

A tactile-driven framework that grasps an exact, user-specified number of objects from dense clutter — verifying the in-hand count by touch and regrasping to correct itself.

Zhejiang University
Corresponding author
QTac teaser figure
Conceptual overview of QTac. The robot estimates the in-hand count from tactile feedback and rectifies initial grasp errors through iterative regrasping to reach the target quantity.
01

Demonstration Video

An overview of the method, data collection, and real-world quantitative grasping results.
02

Abstract

We investigate the novel task of quantitative robotic grasping and propose QTac, a tactile-driven framework designed to grasp a user-specified number of objects. Existing vision-only approaches struggle with severe occlusions in such tasks, making tactile feedback essential for reliably verifying the in-hand quantity. However, applying this concept faces two key challenges: the inherent unreliability of single-attempt grasping paradigms, and the difficulty of integrating high-dimensional tactile signals into existing manipulation models.

QTac addresses these challenges through two key innovations: (1) a human-inspired demonstration strategy that endows the robot with iterative regrasping capabilities to rectify initial count mismatches, reducing the reliance on complex sensory feedback hardware in teleoperation; (2) a decoupled tactile perception module that translates high-dimensional tactile signals into explicit quantitative feedback, directly guiding corrective regrasping. Comprehensive real-world experiments across diverse objects validate that QTac achieves reliable quantitative grasping in dense clutter and successfully extends its quantification capability to novel objects.

03

Method

QTac framework overview
Overview of the QTac framework. A dual-mode data collection strategy, a standalone tactile CountNet, and a DiTFlow-based generative policy conditioned on the count distribution and the user-specified target.
Demonstrations

Dual-Mode Data Collection

Direct-grasping trajectories give dense contact-frame supervision for CountNet, while free-adjustment trajectories provide the regrasp-rich primitives that teach the policy to correct count mismatches — without extra sensory hardware.

Perception

Tactile CountNet

A decoupled module maps bilateral tactile depth maps to a probabilistic count distribution. Keeping perception explicit and standalone lets it transfer to novel objects without retraining.

Policy

DiTFlow Regrasping

A conditional flow-matching policy fuses the count distribution, target quantity, vision, and proprioception to synthesize corrective actions, iteratively regrasping until the achieved count matches the target.

04

Qualitative Results

The policy continuously performs exploratory adjustments until the explicitly decoded tactile state matches the target count. Successful quantitative grasps prior to placement are highlighted; * denotes novel objects.

QTac qualitative results
Reactive recovery behaviors across diverse tasks and target quantities. Each row shows the Initial Grasp → Adjust → Regrasp → Place sequence, with the decoded left/right tactile state on the right.
05

Quantitative Results

Table II. Quantitative grasping performance across 6 tasks (MAE ↓ / Success Rate % ↑). N/A: Ours (Spec.) needs per-object direct-grasping data, not collected for novel objects T5–T6.
Task Vision-Only End-to-End PC [42] π0.5 (V) [43] π0.5 (V+T) Ours (Gen.) Ours (Spec.)
MAESR MAESR MAESR MAESR MAESR MAESR MAESR
T1 · Envelope 0.8733.3 0.6743.3 1.0730.0 1.5316.7 2.276.7 0.5350.0 0.4356.7
T2 · Chip 1.2023.3 1.1723.3 1.4326.7 2.0010.0 1.9013.3 0.7736.7 0.5050.0
T3 · Pencil 0.9323.3 0.8326.7 1.1023.3 0.8723.3 1.3310.0 0.7033.3 0.4360.0
T4 · Hook 0.7043.3 0.5053.3 0.6326.7 0.8033.3 0.6053.3 0.4060.0 0.2376.7
Mean (T1–T4) 0.9330.8 0.7936.7 1.0626.7 1.3020.8 1.5320.8 0.6045.0 0.4060.9
T5 · Ring * 0.8740.0 1.0736.7 1.8013.3 1.4720.0 1.2720.0 0.6356.7 N/AN/A
T6 · Rod * 0.5053.3 0.7340.0 0.7036.7 0.7336.7 0.6740.0 0.3366.7 N/AN/A
Mean (T1–T6) 0.8536.1 0.8337.2 1.1226.1 1.2323.3 1.3423.9 0.5650.6
Ours (Spec.) gives the best in-domain performance (60.9% SR, 0.40 MAE on T1–T4), while the single Generalist CountNet transfers to novel objects T5–T6 with no perceptual retraining.